Page 1 of 3
Old Issue No. 5: Shaman Recast Delays are Too Long

Posted:
Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:51 am
by WaringMcMarrin

Posted:
Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:07 pm
by Ughbash

Posted:
Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:51 pm
by Dakota

Posted:
Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:58 pm
by Jaraman

Posted:
Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:48 am
by Aruman

Posted:
Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:21 am
by Tineren
First of all, the recast on Wishka sucks. But to be fair:
Protection of Wishka is 12/18/25 corruption resist, and has a 5-minute recast time.
stacks with
Shared Purity is 10/15/20 corruption resist, and has the standard recast time.
So it doesn't provide only 5 more resists, it provides 25 more.

Posted:
Sat Oct 21, 2006 2:39 pm
by brell.illitian

Posted:
Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:01 pm
by WaringMcMarrin

Posted:
Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:13 pm
by Brohg

Posted:
Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:25 am
by Ungkor

Posted:
Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:35 am
by Kianor

Posted:
Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:54 am
by Unmei

Posted:
Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:35 am
by XeroOmega

Posted:
Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:22 am
by Unmei

Posted:
Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:28 am
by XeroOmega

Posted:
Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:19 pm
by Kianor

Posted:
Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:17 pm
by Tarnnok

Posted:
Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:52 pm
by Galelor

Posted:
Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:31 pm
by Tordail

Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:11 pm
by Tugela
The pet spell would be to place limits on how quickly you could get a pet up again. It could be changed by eliminating the recast and extending the cast time, but then you would have less time when you could be casting other spells. Personally I would prefer a longer recast and a shorter cast time. 35s recast, 1s cast would be preferable and still maintain the same balance aspect.
Same argument for Second Life, but in that case they designed the spell properly to start with (long recast, short cast).

Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:21 pm
by WaringMcMarrin

Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:39 pm
by Tugela

Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:43 pm
by WaringMcMarrin

Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:53 pm
by Brohg
Tugela, there's no reason why it should take that much total time no matter the cast/recast balance. You act like there's some grand reason why a 40 dps speedbump has to take half a minute to produce.

Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:28 pm
by Tugela

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:27 am
by Kianor

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:40 am
by WaringMcMarrin

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:10 pm
by Tugela
You are missing the point Waring. The recast times are there for balance reasons, and part of the total recast time package which includes both cast and recast times. They may be open to removing the recast times, but they will want to keep the total cycle time more or less the same. That means that if they grant your request the cast time of those spells will increase. Or (as happened with the malos line) they will massively bump up the mana cost.
Remember that when you ask for a change like this you get the whole package, both the positive and the negative. IMO the negative that will come with the positive you are asking for is far worse than the current situation.
You guys need to think about the implications of the things you are requesting.

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:22 pm
by Kianor
Tugela, I understand what you're saying about balancing implications, but this is hardly a life and death thing, removing the pet recast is hardly going to be game changing, just getting rid of one of those irritations.

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:23 pm
by WaringMcMarrin

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:38 pm
by Brohg

Posted:
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:14 pm
by Jaraman

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:08 pm
by Unmei

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:26 pm
by XeroOmega
pet recast

Posted:
Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:57 pm
by Lestumpette

Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:58 pm
by Tugela

Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
by Tharkis

Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:33 pm
by XeroOmega

Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:44 pm
by Ughbash

Posted:
Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:13 am
by Tugela