Weekly Feedback 5/707-5/13/07

Posted:
Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:34 pm
by WaringMcMarrin
Post the feedback here and please follow the new format if possible.

Posted:
Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:31 pm
by Unmei
Freakin' begs for RGC as well.
And you know the funny thing? Until LDoN, RGC was a -raid- -acquired- -spell-. You didn't raid, it didn't take up any space in your spell book.
But yes, as people have pointed out, it's combining the "only useful on raids" spells with the "You only get X spells" artificial limit that really creates this problem, because now you can be -sure- that that raid only spell is taking a spot that could have been used for something generally useful.

Posted:
Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:38 am
by Zinovy
And your not quite correct on 4th event either there is another use for it but only last part of the fight does he cast it. Well wait till 6 then you'll understand... Anyway someone else pointed out the usefulness to me for the Stich encounter... Which since we've not done that in months I'd forgotten.
That said, I'd still wish that all the priests got the Chant of the Napaea + Expunge... and give like the paladin/bard the lesser corruption ones.
As far as the balance I'd prefer there not to be any imbalance when it came to priests and curing (although our disinfecting aura used to be superior single cure vs all classes at that time).
My reasoning is very simple atm I have Remove Curse for Corruption and Clerics have Remove Greater Curse... Encounters aren't gonna get lighter on the counters the're just going to get worse... so I want the same level of curing across the board (priests that is).
ATM bards are better for most curing events due to their faster spell casting times. I don't want them nerfed I'd just like to see us better then a jack-of-all-trades class..
And I'm sure we'd all like that Crusader's Purity if not a superior spell (us being pure priest them being a hybrid)